Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00021
Original file (PD 2014 00021.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE : PD -20 1 4 - 00021
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army   BOARD DATE: 2014 0805
Separation Date: 20060709


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty PFC/ E- 3 (11B/Infantryman) medically separated for chronic neck pain. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent U3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The “ chronic neck pain ” condition was forwarded to the Physical Evalua tion Board (PEB) IAW AR 40- 501 . No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The I nformal PEB adjudicated “chronic neck pain after traumatic injury on airborne operation in February 2005 ” as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of AR 635-40 . The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : “Worsening condition of thoracic spine and cervical spine strain. Worsening condition of left knee.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting chronic neck pain condition is addressed below. No additional conditions, including left knee pain, are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation. The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him; but, must emphasize that the military Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate service members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans' Affairs, operating under a different set of laws.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20060503
 VA - (2 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Neck Pain 5299-5237 10% Cervical Spine Strain-claimed as neck condition 5237 10% 20060921
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 2 (Not in Scope)
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 30%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20061130 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS])


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board makes note that some of the CI’s contended conditions are derived from VA evaluations performed well after separation and that his current VA ratings are higher than those reflected in the above rating chart. Although some of these conditions and ratings were assigned an effective date to the time of separation, the earliest VA rating examination underpinning them was performed 2 months after separation. The Board’s operative instruction, DoDI 6040.44, specifies a 12-month interval for special consideration to VA findings. This does not mean that the later VA evidence was disregarded, but the Board’s recommendations are directed to the severity and fitness implications of conditions at the time of separation. In this circumstance, therefore, the evidence from the service record is assigned significantly more probative value as a basis for the Board’s recommendations.

Chronic Neck Pain Condition . The CI sustained an injury to his neck in February 2005 during an airborne operation when he had a hard landing onto the left side of his body . He developed more pain in his neck and back after he got back up and carried his combat load. The CI was able to complete the operation , but subsequently reported to sick call for evaluation. The primary care provider noted continued neck pain for two weeks after the jump and radicular symptoms in a C7-8 distribution , and referred the CI to p hysical t herapy (PT) for evaluation and treatment. A cervical spine X -ray was normal. A cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated joint osteophytes from C4-5 to C5-7, minimal disc desiccation from C4-5 to C6-7 , and a very small lateral disc protrusion present at C6-7 ; however there was no significant disc herniation or cord compression. The CI was evaluated by PT who noted pain that averaged 5-6/10 in the neck with minimal relief from a variety of therapies. The examiner diagnosed myalgia and myositis with diffuse cervical, thoracic , and high lumbar myofascial pain. The CI w as also referred to a c hiropractor who documented constant dull neck pain and stiffness with an occasional sharp increase with activity. The CI followed with the c hiropractor for six treatments with a poor response. The physical medicine examiner documented neck pain, numbness in the last two digits and the ulnar aspect of the forearm , with pain that avera g ed 5-6/10 . The CI was referred back to PT for more specific therapy. The CI was given a permanent U3 Profile for neck pain cervical spondylosis ( neck spinal disc herniation and arthritis) and t he c ommander’s s tatement noted that the CI continued to experience muscle spasms, lack o f sleep, mild to sever e pain , and frequent headaches which interfered with his MOS duty performance. The MEB n arrative s ummary (NARSUM) exam , approximately 3.5 months prior to separation , documented that the CI continued to have significant limitations with running, road marching with more tha n 15 pounds , and an inability to wear his protective equipment to perform airborne operations or to perform any of the primary events for fitness testing . He further documented that the CI had a poor response despite multiple treatment modalities by PT, a chiropractor , and physical medicine . The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam performed approximately 2. 5 months after separation documented that the CI had constant neck stiffness with a pain level rated at 6/10 and worsened with physical activity. He further noted that the CI could function without medication ; however , he had pain with any movement of the neck.

The Board directs attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB coded the c hronic n eck p ain condition as 5299 analogous to 5237 ( l umbosacral or cervical strain ) and rated at 10%. The VA also coded the cervical spine strain (claimed as neck condition ) condition as 5237 and rated at 10%. The General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “w ith or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease . ” Both the PEB and the VA exams met the 10% rating criteria . After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic neck pain condition.


BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the AR 635-40 for rating c hronic n eck p ain was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated by the Board independently of that regulation. In the matter of the c hronic n eck p ain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


 RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI's disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 131223 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record




                          
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
invalid font number 31502


SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150003734 (PD201400021)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00749

    Original file (PD-2014-00749.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Separation Date: 20051117 Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Neck & Shoulder Pain due to Myofascial Pain Syndrome & C7 Facet Degeneration523710%Cervical Strain w/Myofascial Pain Syndrome5323-523710%20060228Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 2 Rating: 10%Combined Rating: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20060427 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) invalid font number 31502 Chronic Neck and Shoulder Pain Condition. The CI was evaluated by...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01525

    Original file (PD-2014-01525.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The CI was given a permanent U3 profile for cervical degenerative disease (neck pain) and another medical condition, with a Code C and specific restrictions noted on the profile.The VA C&P exam approximately 2 months prior to separation documented that the CI reported...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00161

    Original file (PD2013 00161.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The ratings for the unfitting neck and back conditions are addressed below. The PT note on 16March 2007, 3 months prior to separation recorded bubble inclinometer ROM without specification of the method used, or normal values, at flexion 21 degrees, and extension 9 degrees with pain.The MEB NARSUM exam on 23 April 2007, approximately2 months prior to separation, documented that the CI’s LBP symptoms had slowly worsened and that he had undergone rest, activity modification, anti-inflammatory...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00114

    Original file (PD2012 00114.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded bilateral ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, chronic neck pain, chronic LBP, and mood disorder with depressive features due to ulnar neuropathy and post-surgical pain unresolved conditions to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Board first considered if both the chronic neck pain and chronic LBP conditions, having been de-coupled from the combined PEB adjudication, were each reasonably justified as independently unfitting. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02281

    Original file (PD-2013-02281.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Service IPEB – Dated 20041221VA - (At Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Back Pain523710%Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD), Lumbar Spine523710%VARD*No Additional MEB/PEB ConditionOther x1 Combined: 10%Combined: 10% *VARD dated 20050418 based the rating on evidence found in the evidence & VA C&P dated 20010117 which was not available for review ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01522

    Original file (PD-2013-01522.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Sensorineural Hearing Loss Condition . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02524

    Original file (PD-2013-02524.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 6.5 months after separation documented that the CI had constant daily neck pain rated at 7/10, neck stiffness occurred with turning the neck to any side with radiation down both upper extremities with feelings of hand weakness during an acute exacerbation. invalid font number 31502 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00132

    Original file (PD2013 00132.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chronic Mandible and Neck Pain Condition . After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 reasonable doubt, the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the chronic mandible pain condition coded 9905. Providing orders showing that the individual was retired with permanent disability effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01380

    Original file (PD-2013-01380.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronic LBP Condition . All exams proximate to separation documented chronic LBP with activity. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02665

    Original file (PD-2013-02665.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain (LBP) without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RECOMMENDATION : The Board,...